Explore Our Blog

The AKT will probably outlive most of us, but in a profoundly mutated form. Knowledge-based licensing exams have survived every previous technological revolution and the dominant scholarly consensus is that they will survive AI too - though they will become shorter, adaptive, embedded in continuous "programmatic" assessment, and far more focused on clinical reasoning under uncertainty than on factual recall.

The GMC's own data show that ethnic minority and international medical graduates are referred to fitness-to-practise processes at roughly twice the rate of white UK-trained doctors - a pattern documented for over thirty years and driven largely by employer referral bias, inadequate support structures, and structural sorting into unsupported roles, rather than by adjudication-stage discrimination. There has been progress on narrowing referral-rate gaps since 2019, but attainment gaps are widening

The rapid NHS expansion of PAs and ACPs has sparked intense debate over patient safety, diagnostic epistemology, doctor substitution, and stark salary inversions. While ACPs demonstrate strong efficacy in chronic care, the 2025 Leng Review mandated renaming PAs to "Assistants" and heavily restricting their scope. With GMC statutory regulation finalizing in 2026, understanding clinical governance, safe delegation, and MDT hierarchies is now a core, assessable component of the AKT.

The UK is expanding medical school intake at a time when postgraduate training posts, clinical academic staff, and educational infrastructure are all under severe strain. The resulting bottleneck has triggered emergency legislation, professional anger, and uncomfortable questions about who gets to train, who gets left behind, and whether the quality of medical education can survive the pressure. For MLA candidates, this is not an abstract policy debate - it is the system they are about to enter.

Cadaveric dissection is vanishing from UK medical schools. Is digital anatomy enough? A rigorous look at the evidence and what it means for MLA candidates.

More than a third of UK medical students show signs of anxiety or depression, yet most stay silent. The fitness to practise paradox, institutional culture, and what this means for AKT and MLA candidates.

The physician associate debate exposes a fundamental tension in NHS workforce planning: the pressure to expand capacity quickly against the imperative to ensure that every patient encounter is clinically safe and transparently conducted. The Leng Review has imposed overdue constraints on a role that expanded faster than its evidence base. But with legal challenges ongoing, implementation uneven, and professional opinion deeply divided, this remains a live and evolving controversy. For MLA candid

Workplace-based assessments underpin UK medical training but face serious validity, reliability, and feedback challenges in the literature. Understanding these limitations matters for MLA candidates and future clinical supervisors alike.

The UK chronic pain prescribing crisis - with millions on long-term opioids and gabapentinoids whose deaths are rising - has provoked NICE's radical NG193 guideline rejecting most analgesics. Implementation has proved far harder than legislation, with critical implications for AKT candidates.

GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated compelling cardiovascular and metabolic benefits, but dramatic weight regain after stopping treatment, a 12-year NHS rollout timeline, and a dangerous private market challenge the promise of this therapeutic revolution for UK primary care.

BME doctors face odds of failing postgraduate exams up to 2.5× higher than peers. As the MLA becomes universal, what does the evidence say?

ChatGPT scores higher on AKT-style questions than most medical students - sometimes by a wide margin. That single fact has ignited a fierce debate about what medical licensing exams are really for, and whether the way we assess future doctors needs a fundamental rethink.